🔗 Share this article

One of some of the most recognizable images of modern history portrays a nude child, her arms spread wide, her features distorted in agony, her body scorched and raw. She can be seen running in the direction of the camera while escaping a napalm attack within the Vietnam War. Nearby, additional kids also run away from the bombed village of Trảng Bàng, amid a backdrop of black clouds and the presence of troops.

This Global Effect from an Powerful Photograph

Just after the publication in the early 1970s, this image—originally named "The Terror of War"—became a traditional phenomenon. Viewed and debated by countless people, it is generally attributed with energizing public opinion against the American involvement during that era. A prominent author afterwards remarked that this profoundly lasting picture featuring nine-year-old the subject in agony likely did more to fuel global outrage regarding the hostilities than lengthy broadcasts of shown atrocities. A legendary British documentarian who documented the fighting labeled it the most powerful photo from what became known as “The Television War”. Another seasoned photojournalist remarked how the photograph stands as in short, a pivotal photographs ever made, especially of the Vietnam war.

A Long-Held Credit and a New Assertion

For half a century, the image was attributed to Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, an emerging local photojournalist working for the Associated Press at the time. However a provocative new documentary released by a global network argues that the well-known photograph—long considered as the peak of photojournalism—may have been taken by another person at the location in the village.

According to the film, "Napalm Girl" may have been taken by an independent photographer, who sold his photos to the AP. The assertion, and the film’s resulting research, originates with a man named Carl Robinson, who claims that the dominant photo chief instructed him to alter the photo's byline from the original photographer to Út, the sole AP staff photographer present during the incident.

This Search to find the Truth

The source, advanced in years, emailed a filmmaker a few years ago, seeking help to locate the unknown photographer. He expressed how, if he could be found, he wanted to offer an acknowledgment. The filmmaker considered the freelance photographers he had met—comparing them to modern freelancers, just as Vietnamese freelancers at the time, are often ignored. Their work is frequently questioned, and they function amid more challenging conditions. They are not insured, no retirement plans, minimal assistance, they often don’t have proper gear, and they are incredibly vulnerable as they capture images in familiar settings.

The filmmaker asked: “What must it feel like for the man who took this image, if indeed Nick Út didn’t take it?” From a photographic perspective, he imagined, it would be deeply distressing. As a follower of photojournalism, particularly the highly regarded documentation from that war, it could prove earth-shattering, perhaps reputation-threatening. The revered history of the photograph within the diaspora meant that the filmmaker whose parents left during the war was reluctant to take on the project. He said, “I didn’t want to disrupt this long-held narrative that credited Nick the image. And I didn’t want to disrupt the existing situation of a community that always respected this achievement.”

The Inquiry Develops

However both the filmmaker and the creator concluded: it was worth asking the question. As members of the press must hold everybody else responsible,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we can pose challenging queries within our profession.”

The documentary follows the journalists in their pursuit of their own investigation, including eyewitness interviews, to public appeals in today's Ho Chi Minh City, to examining footage from related materials taken that day. Their work lead to a name: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, employed by a news network that day who also worked as a stringer to the press independently. In the film, a heartfelt the man, now also elderly and living in California, states that he sold the image to the AP for a small fee and a print, but was plagued by the lack of credit for decades.

The Backlash Followed by Further Scrutiny

He is portrayed throughout the documentary, thoughtful and calm, but his story became incendiary in the community of war photography. {Days before|Shortly prior to