🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When including these expenses versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many our government's military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.